11/13/2023 0 Comments Postgres vs mysql vs mariadb![]() Aurora would be my preferred choice given the benefits it offers, storage optimizations it comes with. If you are on AWS, thet have different offerings for database services. Don't spin up your own MySQL installation on your own Linux box. Hi Erin! First of all, you'd probably want to go with a managed service. ![]() The CPU hit is worth it compared to the querying capabilities. Ie if you have - just make a table with an x and y column and generate the JSON. If the queried fields are very predictable, you should probably consider storing the fields as separate columns to have better querying capabilities. Your indexes are going to approach it similar to a long string. If this is always going to be more or less the same JSON and the fields are going to be predictably the same, then the fact that it's JSON doesn't particularly matter much. ![]() If this sounds like your predicament, 100% go for MongoDB. It's hard to solve this in a standard relational model: Indexing on a single column that has wildly different values is pretty much impossible to do efficiently and pulling out the data in its own columns is hard because it's hard to predict how many columns you'd have or what their datatypes would be. So if your JSON is going to vary a lot/is unpredictable/will change over time and you need to run queries efficiently like 'records where the field x exists and its value is higher than 3', that's a great use case for MongoDB. MongoDB gets rid of the relational aspect of data in favor of data being very fluid in structure. (And if you actually need to store the data as JSON it's generally pretty inexpensive to generate a JSON object) I think the key thing to look for is what kind of queries you're expecting to do on that JSON and how stable that data is going to be. Here's a link to MariaDB's open source repository on GitHub.Īccording to the StackShare community, MariaDB has a broader approval, being mentioned in 496 company stacks & 461 developers stacks compared to Microsoft SQL Server, which is listed in 478 company stacks and 443 developer stacks. MariaDB is an open source tool with 2.82K GitHub stars and 864 GitHub forks. net" are the primary reasons why Microsoft SQL Server is favored. "Drop-in mysql replacement", "Great performance" and "Open source" are the key factors why developers consider MariaDB whereas "Reliable and easy to use", "High performance" and "Great with. MariaDB and Microsoft SQL Server belong to "Databases" category of the tech stack. Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance Microsoft SQL Server: A relational database management system developed by Microsoft. Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB: An enhanced, drop-in replacement for MySQL. MariaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server: What are the differences?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |